《On Science》英文读后感【精彩3篇】

《On Science》英文读后感 篇一

After reading "On Science", I was left in awe of the vastness and complexity of the scientific world. The book delves into various scientific disciplines and explores the wonders of the universe, from the microscopic level to the astronomical scale.

One of the things that struck me the most was the author's emphasis on the importance of curiosity in the pursuit of scientific knowledge. Science is not just about finding answers, but about asking questions and seeking understanding. It is through curiosity that scientists are able to make groundbreaking discoveries and push the boundaries of human knowledge.

The book also highlighted the collaborative nature of scientific research. Scientists from different fields often work together to solve complex problems and advance our understanding of the world. This collaborative approach fosters innovation and allows for the exchange of ideas and perspectives. It reminded me of the saying, "Two heads are better than one", and how true it is in the scientific community.

Furthermore, "On Science" shed light on the ethical implications of scientific advancements. While science has the power to improve our lives and solve societal issues, it also raises important ethical questions. The book touched on topics such as genetic engineering, artificial intelligence, and climate change, all of which require careful consideration of the potential consequences and ethical implications.

As I read through the book, I became increasingly aware of the impact that science has on our daily lives. From the technology we use to the medicine we rely on, science plays a crucial role in shaping our world. It is through scientific advancements that we are able to overcome challenges and improve the quality of life for people around the globe.

Overall, "On Science" has deepened my appreciation for the wonders of the scientific world. It has opened my eyes to the remarkable achievements of scientists throughout history and the ongoing quest for knowledge. The book has shown me that science is not a mere collection of facts, but a dynamic and ever-evolving field that continues to inspire and captivate. I am now more eager than ever to explore the world of science and contribute to its advancement in any way I can.

《On Science》英文读后感 篇二

Reading "On Science" has been a thought-provoking experience that has challenged my understanding of the world and the role of science in it. The book takes a critical look at the scientific method and its limitations, urging readers to think beyond the confines of traditional scientific thinking.

One of the key ideas presented in the book is the concept of scientific uncertainty. The author argues that science is not infallible and that there are inherent limitations in our understanding of the world. This perspective has made me realize that science is not just about finding definitive answers, but about acknowledging the gaps in our knowledge and embracing uncertainty.

The book also touches on the importance of interdisciplinary research. It emphasizes the need for scientists to step outside their comfort zones and collaborate with experts from different fields. This interdisciplinary approach allows for a more holistic understanding of complex problems and opens up new avenues for innovation.

Furthermore, "On Science" challenges the notion of scientific objectivity. The author argues that scientists are not separate from the society in which they live and that their work is influenced by societal norms and values. This idea has made me reflect on the potential biases that can exist within scientific research and the importance of critically examining the assumptions and biases that may underlie scientific findings.

Another thought-provoking aspect of the book is its exploration of the role of science in addressing societal challenges. The author argues that science should not be seen as a separate entity from society, but as a tool for social change. This perspective has made me realize the importance of considering the broader implications of scientific research and how it can contribute to addressing pressing global issues.

Reading "On Science" has been an eye-opening experience that has challenged my preconceived notions about science. It has made me realize that science is not a fixed body of knowledge, but a dynamic and evolving process. The book has inspired me to approach science with a more critical and open-minded mindset and to embrace the uncertainties and complexities that come with it.

Overall, "On Science" has deepened my appreciation for the role of science in our lives and the need for ongoing reflection and critical thinking. It has shown me that science is not just a set of facts, but a way of thinking and exploring the world. I am now more motivated than ever to engage with scientific research and contribute to the ongoing quest for knowledge.

《On Science》英文读后感 篇三

《On Science》英文读后感

　　品味完一本名著后，想必你有不少可以分享的东西，是时候静下心来好好写写读后感了。千万不能认为读后感随便应付就可以，下面是小编收集整理的《On Science》英文读后感，欢迎阅读，希望大家能够喜欢。

　　I have got a lot of interesting scientific knowledge from the books of National Geographic Reading Expeditions, some of which are about life, physics. I really can’t help losing myself in the colorful pictures and clear words in the books. After reading the books, I have been considering a question: What if we lived without science?

　　Great changes have taken place in the world with the help of science. In the past, life was nasty, brutish and short. It is hard to imagine how our forefathers could do without so many conveniences that modern science brings about. Back then, only a small group of people enjoyed the very few comforts. But the majority of people didn’t even have sufficient food, let along their privilege to be educated. Anyway, it is science that changes the world and makes people’s life better and better, although it also leads to some bad aspects at the same time.

　　From the discovery of the gravity to the first step on the moon, we human beings have experienced a long process of developing science. And now, this process is still continuing much faster. New organisms are already being engineered, and new genetically modified crops promise benefits from higher yields and less use of harmful chemicals and so on. A lot of examples are showing this point. In the future, changes are likely to be even much greater as science reaches out to shape life itself. Maybe one day, the possibility that life existed on Mars billions of years ago will be potentially one of the greatest discoveries of our time. It is the force of the competition, we human beings’ inquiring mind and initiative that bring about the non-stopped development of science. Therefore, it is difficult and impossible to prevent science from changing the world and our life as well.

　　At present, we are in two minds about science. On the one hand, we are enjoying the sweet life as a result of the evelopment of science, and expect it to continue. And we are showing our interests into some scientific expeditions, such as the astronomy, the alien civilization, etc. On the other hand, we are distrustful of it, due to the lack of understanding of science. Some people thus far are still very superstitious, and they would even beli

　　Stephen Hawking, one of the most remarkable scientists in the world, once said, “In a democratic society, the public needs to have a basic understanding of the science, so that it can make informed decisions and not leave them in the hands of experts.” This has reminded me of Professor Alan G. MacDiarmid from America, the person who got the Nobel Prize for chemistry in the year of 20xx. In his lecture at Peking University this year, he put forward that science is people. He also expounded the importance of the basic science for the public. Evidently, every one of us does need science, or we can’t live without it.

　　Now that everyone needs science, why not take advantage of some means to give the public the right basic scientific knowledge? So when they face the problems such as acid rain, the greenhouse effect, nuclear weapons, environment destruction and some other problems, they can also make informed decisions on these subjects, just as what Hawking said. One aspect relies on what is taught in schools. But science is often taught in an uninteresting way and most students just learn it by rote to pass examinations. However, the final goal of learning science is not to pass examinations or to get a higher score; instead, we should try to make full use of it to change our world and life. While learning, we should try to ask more questions and we should have the courage of suspecting the knowledge in the books, as some of the scientific conclusions are likely to be corrected in the future. Who knows. So not only must we change our attitude towards science, but also the way of teaching and learning science.

　　In addition, science is always changing at a fast rate, and who we learn at school isn’t that sufficient to last a lifetime. So the mass media including TV, radio, newspaper, magazine and publishing company will play an important role in reporting the latest science in time. Moreover, the mass media can also popularize basic science to the public, because only in this way will more people realize what on earth science is.

　　“Scientists and engineers tend to express their ideas in the form of equations because they need to know the precise values of quantities. But for the rest of us, a qualitative grasp of scientific concepts is sufficient, and this can be conveyed by words and diagrams, without the use of equations”, said Stephen Hawking.

　　I agree with him very much, and, I’m fond of the wonderful words above, from Stephen Hawking.

　　For the development of science, are you ready?